Wired
In a case where a man who is believed to have been involved in the case was arrested due to frequent theft cases at multiple Apple stores on the east coast of the United States, a trial in which the man sued Apple for misidentification is controversial. ..
“Fake” steal in various parts of the east coast
According to a complaint filed in the United States District Court for the State of Massachusetts, Apple and its security industry Specialists (SIS) misunderstood plaintiff Usmane Barr as the blackout of the theft case. It seems that he tried to hide it even after it was discovered.
In March 2018, Mr. Barr obtained a provisional license to drive a car in New York, but lost it. There was no photo, and the height, weight, date of birth, and eye color were recorded, but if you lost it, you wouldn’t have imagined that you would be involved in a terrible incident. He learned of the seriousness of the situation when he was arrested at his home in New York in November 2018.
Why-I don’t remember at all-what was waiting for Mr. Barr, who was confused, was the fact that he was treated as a serial thief in the Apple Store. The lost learner’s license was being used by multiple thieves. In Connecticut in April 2018 and in New Jersey in May, September and October of the same year, “fake” people who abused his learner’s permit were stealing at the Apple Store. That’s why Apple and SIS linked Mr. Barr’s identity to the criminal, shared it at stores nationwide, and marked it with facial recognition.
Claimed that face recognition was inadequate
However, it is strange that multiple people are associated with Mr. Barr. In fact, two days after Mr. Barr himself was arrested, the fake was arrested for stealing at the Apple Store in Massachusetts.
As things became clearer, it became clear that Apple and SIS face recognition and records management, and cross-state police information sharing were sloppy. For example, one fake was completely dissimilar in face and height, except that they were both black. Another fake was somehow repatriated as Mr. Barr, even though his fingerprints revealed that he was Mamadou Barry.
Mr. Barr claimed that he was irrelevant and requested evidence footage from Apple, but the company refused that the footage had been deleted and finally responded a few months later, but it was released as an “accomplice”. It was a video of another thief allegedly. As a result, he decided that Apple and SIS did not admit the mistake and intentionally tried to hide the facts, and filed a lawsuit against both companies for defamation and intentional negligence even though they knew that the data was incorrect. I did. Mr. Barr is currently demanding the suspension of criminal charges and public apologies and rehabilitation.
Source: AppleInsider
(kihachi)
Source: iPhone Mania