in

Starlink vs Fiber-Optics Speed Test In City



Taven Diorio
Scottsdale, Arizona🌵🏜

Video Location / Information
Location – Scottsdale, Arizona
Date recorded – 8/10/2022

📡DATA INFORMATION 🛰

Starlink Test results

Test 1 – 27.8 down, 3.60 up, ping 50
Test 2 – 62.3 down, 3.26 up, ping 49
Test 3 – 46.6 down, 2.90 up, ping 60

Fiber Optics Test results

Test 1 – 513 down, 443 up, 6 ping
Test 2 – 489 down, 380 up, 7 ping
Test 3 – 452 down, 305 up, 12 ping

Final results

Fiber Optics – ~ 484 DOWN, ~375 UP
~8.3 PING

Starlink – ~45.5 DOWN, ~ 3.2 UP
~53 PING

Comparison –
~165% DOWN
~196% UP
~145% PING

Equipment

Star-link🌌

Camera – GoPro Hero 10

https://gopro.com/en/us/shop/cameras/hero10-black/CHDHX-101-master.html

Drone – DJI Mini 2

https://www.dji.com/mini-2

Editing Software – I Movie
https://www.apple.com/imovie/

Camera Settings

4K 30FPS
Wide Angle Lenses

⚠️Warning – Some Visual Effects May Not Be Suitable for those with Epilepsy⚠️

Share this:

7 Comments

  1. Your percentage calculations were wrong. Just on downloads, fiber optic was 963% better then StarLink on average. You could also say StarLink only has 9.4% the capacity of existing technology.

    It sells for $600 and uses 1.15 kwh of power per day. Then it performs at less then 1/10 as well as your existing system. You are paying a lot of money to maybe use the system when traveling.

  2. Honestly this overall was a great video. However I understand what these speed test show, but actual reality seems the same. I have starlink and a t-mobile hot spot at home in the county. I use fiber at work and I cannot see a difference in speed when simply browsing the web at all. To be fair it may be the firewall at work since I’m an engineer they may be screening everything we do. Not sure why but I don’t see the difference here in Texas.

  3. Great video, but Starlink was originally made for people (in all countries) who cannot get fiber, or even decent 4G (like me —- running on 16mb of DSL, and non-existent 4G still!) 🙂