in

Intel’s New CPUs Will Draw EVEN MORE POWER



CHECK OUT SCDKEY FOR WINDOWS AT A HUGE DISCOUNT:
25% code: vex
Windows 10 pro ($15):
Windows 11 pro($21): https://bit.ly/3Vdw2YN
Windows 10 Home($14): https://bit.ly/3YvBbhP
Office 2021($53): https://bit.ly/3FH8oye
Visual Studio 2022 ($98): https://bit.ly/3IGeKQG

Intel is doing a refresh to 13th generation raptor lake CPUs. Given how much power those already drew, we COULD EASILY see a CPU pulling 350w. IDK WHATS GOING ONNN!!

JOIN THE DISCORD!
https://discord.gg/xbVEkhPJ72

HUB: https://youtu.be/gQUyakr44TA?t=1053
https://youtu.be/78lp1TGFvKc
GN: https://youtu.be/-KbNz8966-I
Jay: https://youtu.be/vmQ7IU8Nj2c

https://wccftech.com/intel-14th-gen-raptor-lake-refresh-desktop-cpus-rumored-to-clock-up-to-6-2-ghz/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raptor_Lake
https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-14th-gen-core-series-to-feature-meteor-lake-s-is-up-to-core-i5-and-65w-tdp-and-arrow-lake-s-up-to-core-i9-and-125w

My Spotify:
https://open.spotify.com/artist/3Xulq08iPhL5CSDqPQYx43

0:00- sneaky way of introducing 13th gen refresh
0:44- Sponsor Segment
1:20- 13900ks was a joke
2:07- The goal of the Raptor Lake refresh
3:03- RIDICULOUS POWER DRAW
3:57- at what cost?
4:40- Introducing even more SKUs
6:27- Another Intel L?

Share this:

21 Comments

  1. this whole intel thing is ridiculous to me. for the 1st time yesterday i set a game to 1080p low to see if my 5900x would become a bottleneck. i was getting something over 400fps and my 6800xt was still the limiting factor. with cpu hanging around 4.7-4.9Ghz with 100w usage. to think you need anything more than that is dumb, especially if you're playing in 2k or 4k. The only reason for people to buy these things is because they dont know better. my cpu is over kill. i got it for $350 at the time a 13900k would've cost me $630. plus a larger cooling solution, possibly a larger case, and a higher power bill. why?

  2. Dude amd is nowhere near as bad as intel. AMD has eco mode what limits the CPU to 105w. In eco mode on my 7950x I'm still pulling 36k in R23. Thats at 105w and a max temp of 73c.

    It's only bad if you leave the processor completely stock with no undervolt or eco mode of any kind which is just silly to do

  3. I cool on Air. I won't use AIO's or custom Water cooling. So, I've given up on getting "advertised" speeds many generations ago. That being said, give me more speed, and I'll tune what I can get out of it. I have 13900k(Got it on sale), and on air I can do 5.4Ghz… The only thing that throttles that is P95 w/AVX. I love the new implementation of OCing, or in my case underclocking, and looking forward to seeing if I can squeeze 5.8 – 6g on a Raptor Lake refresh. At least I don't have to buy a new platform.

  4. Sort of a dumb thing to worry about… I have an i7 13700 and playing most games the CPU rarely goes over 90W. When running office or visual studio same story. Never over 80W for desktop office productivity. Once in a while I transcode some videos in handbrake and because that is GPU aware it barely uses CPU. My biggest power sucker is when doing browser automation on Edge.

  5. Ok but if they use 350 watts thats just at 100% right? So while gaming it’s not that much more maybe.. and being a flight simmer enthousiast (and not wanting to change to AMD) I need every last ounce of CPU performance because it is 100% of the time limited by the CPU/ main thread…

  6. It’s ridiculous the amount of power a modern gaming pc needs, if you factor what you pay for power in your zone, it may be more viable to play on GeForce or any other streaming service on a Chromebook and save a huge chunk of money

  7. Ridiculous. 13900k consumed 150-160 watts when gaming. And almost 300 when doing multi core work loads. Expect the gaming power consumption to jump up to 180 or 190. Meanwhile. Ryzen 7950x and 7950x3d use an average of 70w when gaming. The choice is obvious.

  8. The problem is Intel has a node problem due to the fact that they fell so far behind and haven’t really innovate for damn near 20 years, and the last thing they made that was a huge innovation was the pentium 4 and the majority of the last decade they did nothing but rehashed quad cores over and over again because their was no real competition and all they cared about was collecting profit.

  9. I think there is a lot of room for improvement in the non k version CPU's. I have the 12600, 3.3 ghz 6 p-core zero e-core 4.8 ghz boost, 65w CPU and envision a meaningful upgrade to something like a i-9 14900 …also 65w. I am not an extreme gamer but this particular CPU 12600 is very decent for a mid level gaming comp. I hope they bump the speeds in the higher end non k chips. An increase of 200-300 mhz base clock with boost approaching 6.0 or high 5.0 ghz could make a BIG difference here. Wattage would have to stay around or below 75 watts though. Am I realistic? I hope so.