AMD RX 7600 XT Could SHAKE Up GPU Market – Price, Specs, Performance

45 Comments

1. I swear if this ends up being another 8GB VRAM and 128-bit bus GPU, I'm just gonna lose all hope and get a used 1080TI (even if it does consume a lot of power)

2. For gaming the existing 7800 XT and 7900 card are an obvious choice. In my mind, just up the memory on the 7600 to 16 g , call it XT, nothing else and call it a day.

   Same segments but better, esspecially for YouTube creation.

3. 24 – 27inch is that sweet spot for most pc gamers so there really aint no need for these mega cards boasting 4k performances same with ray tracying no one cares, its kinda a gimmik aimed more so at the consolers. Not like when phyics became a thing, most turn off this stuff for the sake of performaces anyway. I just want a great priced mid range 1440p card thats not gonna need be to upgrade my 650w psu

4. This card will be equivalent to a 6700 XT in terms of performance.
   And if you wanted 6700 XT you could have gotten that in 2021. Which is on-par with a 3060Ti (which is from 2020).
   
   The ONLY reason to care about this is if it's 16GB at $299.
   
   AMD cards need to be at the same (or better) performance for 30-35% cheaper than Nvidia for people to care. 25% is pushing it. Won't "shake up" anything.

5. I want a 12gb w/ 192 bus 7600xt.

6. Amd should make an rx7800 with a 2pcislot height.

7. It won't shake anything, the sheeps will buy 4060 regardless.

8. This card is going to be a 6700XT replacement. Its not going to be really exciting.

9. AI is sick, everyone will be using it soon, and there's absolutely no upper limit on VRAM requirements. Every GB is HUGE for future use, even if you don't like to fiddle with AI, your card will be worth more and resell better for having extra VRAM.

10. I mean I got a 7600. They gave me Starfield.. which I don’t play.

11. "very intriguing but not surprising" what? it's not intriguing at all (1080p monitors selling best)

12. The Intel Arc A580s with 8GB GDDR6 can be had for less than $200 today for 1080p gaming. For me, it's a better value.

13. AMD only talks SHIT, while NVIDIA Delivers whatever it says (somewhat xD)

14. Shake my BOOTY, unstable King, first learn to release "Stable Early Drivers" for games. Improve drivers first, hardware specs are useless.

15. why did you gloss over the 3070?

16. Used will always be my go to… unless its scalpers. I would rather spend 4x the value at the company than pay a scalper… not that I could afford either…

17. Feels like we do this every year. They'll price it close to an Nvidia midrange option, undercutting yet not changing the affordability of the actual midrange segment. The ONLY way anything changes is if they undercut the negative profit Intel Arc A580, which simply won't happen. I'll pray for AMD to price it according to the A750, but i wont get my hopes up for sub-$200. The times are genuinely that sad and pathetic. I miss budget gpus

18. If amd wants to turn around the optics of their brand … they need to deliver at the 300-350 price range. Want to prove to me your drivers are no longer an issue? Do it with a bargain price that makes me leap away from NVIDIA.

19. The word 'budget' in itself means just some decided amount of money reserved for something.
    It could be 100 coins, it could be 1000 coins.
    So around what ballpark is this "new budget"?

20. Im feel very sad because i buy RX 7600 8gb at 2 dec 23 now amd say giving you muchh better card just little bit add price more 7600XT. Feel very sad now

21. Giving the 7600XT 16GB ov VRAM would effectively kill the 7700XT with its 12GB. AMD is very unlikely to do that.

22. so eseentially its just a 4060ti

23. 4060ti with 8 gigs of vram for 400 is a joke

24. 5:09 24% is not that small of a jump the 7600 should never be said as a 6650 XT replacement!!

25. Why is gpus so cheap in the us. Where i live the rx7600 is like 380$

26. My main goal is to play apex 1080 low settings with a stable frame locked 165 fps.

    Im wondering what to pair with an 12400f / 12600kf…

    I imagine to get at least 144 would require a 7600 6650 xt

27. Every time I hear comparisons about Nvidia and AMD. The Nvidia fanboys always talk about features that nobody will use for example faster encoding. In other words, they talk about features that gamers will never use. If you are trying to be a gaming brand and advertise to gamers, then all that matters is fps and price (to a lesser extent power efficiency). If you game then buy AMD especially if you are a low end or average user $500 and less. The people who buy Nvidia usually buy the high end, they use it for work not gaming, and it's a tax write off so they don't care about money.
    The fact that people still buy Nvidia at these prices and at the low end makes me shake my head.

28. i have a 1 year old 6650xt that kicks pretty good…but it's only 8gb. i am paying real close attention to the 7600xt…depending on pricing it could be the budget to mid king. will it be 12gb, 16gb or a model of each? idk

29. My 7900 xtx says hi

30. AMD needs to cut the price of the RX 7600 to $199.
    We know that they can afford to do this because they're already selling the RX 6600 for that price. The N6 manufacturing process which the RX 7600 is based on is about the same price as the N7 process which the RX 6600 uses, and the RX 7600 actually uses a smaller chip than the RX 6600. The RX 6600 is partially disabled while the 7600 is not, but the N6 and N7 processes have such high yields than doing this normally isn't necessary – AMD just does it for the sake of product segmentation; dies with defective components are so rare that AMD doesn't actually need to sell them to make a profit, most RX 6600s are based on dies that would have been 100% functional.
    Even though this would reduce AMD's profit margins on the RX 7600, it would create a huge amount of customer goodwill and a perception that AMD had led the GPU market back to normality after the mining boom, pandemic, and AI boom all contributed to extortionate prices for 3 generations. The sales volume would compensate for the reduced margin and provide similar or greater total profit, and could give AMD a greater GPU market share.
    The RX 7600 is easily AMD's weakest GPU on the market relative to Nvidia, because the RTX 4060 is only slightly more expensive, but has slightly better overall rasterisation performance, uses much less power, and has better upscaling technology, all of which are important advantages for low-end GPUs. While it doesn't matter much for low-end GPUs, the RTX 4060 also has better ray tracing hardware than the RX 7600.
    If AMD's marketing department is sane, they will announce an official MSRP reduction and get the credit for it, rather than quietly waiting for their AIB partners to reduce the price for them. The Navi 33 die which the RX 7600 is based on is designed for cheap mass production, so why the hell is AMD not capitalising on it and using it to gain reputation and market share?

31. Entry level should be performing around 3080 10GB levels. The ONLY reason home PC non-laptop gamers are playing at 1080P so often is due to the cost of Graphics cards that can effectively run games at 1440P High with Ultra textures around 60FPS is RIDICULOUS. It is still $500 bucks to run at 1440P High/Ultra Tex/60 FPS with console raytracing settings. This resolution is because of the cards, not because people can't afford 1440P and 4K displays as the price difference to go from 1080P to 1440P is about $20 bucks in most cases. Blame AMD and Nvidia. They are the ones holding us back, and the 7600XT is not going to "Save us." It will just keep people buried at 1080P Ultra…for $300 bucks, even though it should be a $199.99 product. Oh, and 4K has been the most popular sales-wise for television purchases since 2019. 4 years they have outsold 1080P displays for regular TV, gaming consoles etc..

32. I bought a 2080 with 8Gb over 5 years ago, and an RX 480 also with 8Gb back in 2016, almost 8 years ago.
    Anything less than 16Gb in 2024 in a high or mid-range card is an insult to the intelligence of customers, considering 16Gb of VRAM cost under $50.

33. i ll get two one for me and one form my sibling

34. I've settled with the rx 7800 xt for £500. I'm pretty much sure that this gpu can help me to jump trough the next gen and choose from the 9xxx series. I'm not sure yet if Intel can catch up properly soon. Nvidia Ti Super nonsense turned me away for now.

35. I noticed they TM,d the 7650xt as wonder what specs that would be.

36. Haven’t we heard this story before? AMD has a chance to release a good product at a great price, just for them to fumble it with bad pricing.

    4060ti 16GB can be found for $450, so I’m guessing AMD will be stupid and release the 7600xt 16GB at $400, making it not worth it.

37. My guess is that the 6700xt will be the best value by far, for three years straight

38. The steam survey always seems a little dodgy

39. It will not be Navi 32 cut down. Because yields are extremely high on the small 200mm2 compute die. Multiple cuts defeat the purpose of chiplets. 7600XT is going to be a highly clocked Navi 33, with 16GB as its selling factor.

40. good point.

41. Not really man. 1080p is covered. And 7600 XT is a No-RT 1080p card.
    Even if this hits the 300$ segment, that segment is flooded with second hand 3060 and 3070 ti at the 2-300 range, which vastly outperforms it.
    So you can get RT at 1080p vs no RT at 1080p.

    LOVE AMD for the FSR.
    Feel bad for them though.

    FSR framegen with DLSS upscaling is looking really good and is lowering latency and input lag by a lot.
    If we could get that XESS working on my onboard GPU at the same time that may be fantastic as well 😛

42. 8:42 a rx 7500xt with 8 gb would be amazing. paired with an i3 12100 or similare would be cracy

43. 7600 xt will be 10gb, 12gb and 16gb with 64bit bus 😊

44. 1440p will NEVER catch up to 1080p!

45. totally clueless to believe its gonna be 16GB…even to consider that staggers me